Monday, December 21, 2015

Module Name: Financial Accounting



Open University Malaysia
Faculty of Business and Management

BBAW 2103
Financial Accounting

Name: Adam Khaleel

Lecturer: Mohamed Shafeeq

Learning Centre: Villa College 

Trimester:  Two, May 2011



Introduction
Analyze of financial statements helps us to recognize a company’s strengths and weaknesses, which lead to good investment strategies and good financial planning. A large number of stakeholders will use and analyze financial statement information, particularly bankers, other lenders, suppliers, investors, and even some of the firm’s customers. For successful analysis and planning of financial statement require an understanding of a company’s external and internal environments. In this assignment includes the analysis of financial statements of State Trading Organization Plc and Bank of Maldives Plc which are two listed companies in different industries in Maldives. This analysis is based on both financial and non-financial information for the past two years from the company’s latest annual reports. In addition to this I will provide detailed profile of these companies, detailed explanation on the categories of ratios, description of these ratios, evaluation and interpretation of ratios by selecting better Performing Company and a conclusion.
  1. State Trading Organization Plc
STO group, with its subsidiaries, JVs and associates, is a national leader in business. It has significant and focused interests in petroleum, cooking gas, construction materials (including cement and roofing material), medical supplies and pharmaceuticals, home appliances, electronic items, supermarket products and insurance. The company is geographically diverse with operations and developments throughout Maldives and operations in Singapore.
This has been achieved by direct procurement and distribution as well as forming joint ventures to effectively trade in areas where it presents greater opportunity. STO maintains strong government ties, making it their trading partner of choice.
STO has diversified in to other sectors of business, competitively trading in construction materials, consumer electronics, home appliances, medical supplies and pharmaceuticals, and a range of high quality supermarket products.

Vision: Be a recognized trading leader in the region, creating enduring value for all stakeholders, positively influencing the lives of the communities we serve and be a catalyst of economic growth supporting economically and environmentally sustainable development.

Mission
  1. Work towards achieving profitability not losing sight of the company’s original founding purpose of ensuring supplies and stable prices of necessities and essentials.
  2. Offer a wide range of quality products and services targeted to the specific needs of consumers and businesses that cater to the changing demands of the market and maximize access to all corners of the country through an effective distribution network.
  3. Seek opportunities for investment abroad and engineer growth through expansion and diversification of our businesses, adapting to changing local and global business conditions.
  4. Contribute to the national economy through investing in local manufacturing, creating Opportunities to help the development of local businesses by offering retail opportunities and strategic partnerships.
  5. Contribute to society through the development of and participation in social programs that directly contribute to the community.
  6. Ensuring good governance through strict compliance with the highest standards of Corporate.
  7. Create a cooperative learning work environment and develop human resources of the company.

Core Values
Nation first - National interest is number one priority
Customer focus - Delight each and every customer
Employee well-being - Pleasant workplace, learning and growth
Leadership - Excel with reliability, integrity, honesty and transparency
Social Responsibility - Care for the society and the environment. State Trading Organization Plc. (2010).

  1. Maldives Transport and Contracting Company Plc
Maldives Transport and Contracting Company Plc (MTCC Plc) is the longest serving public company in Maldives, holding a little more than 50% shares by The Government of Maldives, and the rest by other companies within the Maldives and by the general public. MTCC Plc was established on 18th December 1980. Since its inception, MTCC Plc has expanded its businesses into contracting works, marine transportation, ferry services, selling and distribution of engines, spare parts, lubricants and paint.

Mission: To contribute fully, to the development of the economy and the country.
Vision: We want to lead in our respective business through organic growth and collaborative innovation and creativity in this fast changing socio economic environment where we foster continuous staff development and be known as the company to be trusted to deliver what the customer wants.
Core Values
  • Collaborative innovation and creativity - continuous improvement as a work ethic.
  • Changing the work environment for employees - people growth and development.
  • Honesty and integrity - respect the fellow individual.
  • Social Responsibility - community contribution and responsibility.
  • Profit, but profit from work that benefits the economy - profitable growth. Maldives Transport and Contracting Company Plc. (2010).

Description of Categories of ratios
A ratio is simply a numerator divided by a denominator. The answer could be in percentage, times and number of days for certain activities to be completed. Ratio analysis refers to methods of calculating and interpreting financial ratios to assess a firm’s performance. It provides details for financial planning, puts details into perspective and manages expectations of creditors and investors. Financial information can be compared using three bases of within the company, between companies and industry average. There are three techniques of analysis of horizontal, vertical and ratio analysis. Horizontal analysis is the comparison in within the company. Vertical analysis is the comparison of within the company and between companies. Ratio analysis is done within the company, between the companies and an industry average. Financial ratios are classified in to four areas; liquidity, efficiency, profitability and debt management.

Liquidity Ratios
It measures the business capability to pay its short-term financial obligation. These ratios are:
  1. Working capital=Current assets-current liabilities
It is used to measure the business capability to fulfill its short-term debts. The result is stated in amount and the higher its value, the better.

  1. Current ratio=Current assets ÷ Current liabilities
It is used measure the adequacy of current assets to settle its current liabilities. The result is in the form of X: 1 and the higher the value X, the better.

  1. Quick ratio=Quick assets÷ Current liabilities
It is used measure the capability of the business to pay immediate short-term debts. The result is in the form of X: 1 and the higher the value X, the better.

Efficiency ratios
It is used measure the level of efficiency and capability of the management to operate its business especially in the usage of assets to generate sales. The efficiency ratios are:  
  1. Account receivable turnover=Credit sales (net) ÷ Average AR (net)
Average AR = (AR last year + AR current year) ÷ 2
It is used to measure the capability to collect debts from customers. The result is in number of times and the higher the AR turnover, the better.

  1. Average collection period = AR × 365 ÷ credit sales (net)
It is used to measure the average number of days taken to collect the amount receivable. The result is in number of days. If the result is less, the better
  1. Inventory turnover = cost of goods sold ÷ Average inventory
Average inventory = (inventory last year + inventory current year) ÷ 2
It is used to measure the adequacy and management of the business’s inventory. The result is in times and the higher the inventory turnover, the better.

  1. Assets turnover = net sales ÷ average total assets
Average total assets = (total asset last year + total asset current year) ÷ 2
It is used to measure the capability of the business in using the asset to generate sales. The result is in times and the ratio is higher, the better.

Profitability ratio:
It measures the ability of the business to generate profit within a specified period. It is used as an indicator to analyze the efficiency and effectiveness level of the business in achieving its profit objective. The profitability ratios are:

  1. Gross Profit Margin =gross profit ÷ net sales × 100
It is used to measure the profit of sales that can be used to pay for the sales and administrative expenses. The result is in percentage and the higher this percentage is better.

  1. Net profit margin = net profit ÷ net sales × 100
It is used to measure the capability of the company to generate gross profit from every Rufiyaa of sales. The result is in percentage and the higher this percentage is better.

  1. Return on asset = net profit ÷ average total assets × 100
Average total assets = (total asset last year + total asset current year) ÷ 2
It is used to measure the management’s efficiency in using the asset to generate profit. The result is in percentage and the higher this percentage is better.

  1. Return of owner’s equity = net profit  ÷ average owners equity × 100
Average owners equity = (total owners equity last year + total owners equity current year) ÷ 2
It is used to measure the success of a business in generating profit for its owner or share holder. The result is in percentage and the higher this percentage is better.

  1. Return on owners equity’s ordinary shares = net profit – dividend for preference share ÷ average owners equity’s ordinary shares × 100
Average owners equity’s ordinary shares = (total ordinary shares last year + total ordinary shares current year) ÷ 2
It is used to measure the effectiveness of the business to generate profit for the ordinary shareholders. The result is in percentage and the higher this percentage is better.

  1. Earnings per share = net profit – dividend for preference share ÷ average ordinary shares issued (unit)
Average ordinary shares issued (unit) = (ordinary share opening balance + ordinary share closing balance) ÷ 2
It is used to measure the net profit generated from each ordinary share. The result is in amount and the higher the value, the better.

  1. Price earnings ratio = market value of ordinary shares per unit  ÷ earning per share
It is used to measure the amount paid by investor for every Rufiyaa earned. The result is in number of times and the higher the number, the better.

  1. Dividend yield = dividend of ordinary shares per unit ÷ market value of ordinary shares per unit
It is used to measure the percentage of returns obtained by ordinary shareholders for every Rufiyaa invested. The result is in percentage and the higher this percentage is better.

  1. Dividend payout ratio = cash dividend ÷ net profit
It is used to measure the percentage of profit distributed in the form of cash dividend to ordinary shareholders. The result is in percentage and the higher this percentage is better.

Debt Management Ratio:
It measures the ability of the business to continue its operation. The ratios are:
  1. Interest cover ratio = (net profit + taxation + interest expenses) ÷ interest expenses
It is used to measure the capability of business to pay interest of the current year from the profit of current year. The result is in times and the higher the ratio, the better.

  1. Debt ratio = total liability ÷ total asset × 100
It is used to measure the percentage of total asset financed by creditors. The result is in percentage and the higher the debt ratio, the lower the equity ratio.

  1. Equity ratio = total owner equity ÷ total asset × 100
It is used to measure the percentage of total asset financed by owner. The result is in percentage and the higher the percentage, the better for creditors.

  1. Debt to equity ratio = total liability ÷ total owner equity × 100
It is used to measure the percentage of liability covered by equity. The result is in percentage and the lower this ratio, the better. (Noor et al., 2010, p. 190-199)


Horizontal Analysis
MALDIVES TRANSPORT AND CONTRACTING COMPANY PLC
Comparative Income Statement
for the year ended 31 December 2009 and 2010

2010 (MRF)
2009 (MRF)
Increase / Decrease
Amount (MRF)
Percentage (%)
Revenue
428,231,046
474,340,631
-46,109,585
-9.7
Cost of good sold
-349,263,930
-365,352,276
16,088,346
-4.4
Gross profit
78,967,116
108,988,355
-30,021,239
-27.5
Other income
4,268,547
3,871,310
397,237
10.3
Selling and distribution expenses
-10,154,730
-31,600,959
21,446,229
-67.9
Administrative expenses
-52,251,808
-63,842,665
11,590,857
-18.2
Other expenses
-6,133,959
-7,021,364
887,405
-12.6
Operating profit
14,695,166
10,394,677
4,300,489
41.4
Finance costs
-20,216,792
-22,750,016
2,533,224
-11.1
Profit for the year
-5,521,626
-12,355,339
6,833,713
-55.3
Earnings per share
-22.09
-49.42
27
-55.3

Maldives Transport and Contracting Company Plc. (2010, 2009).


MALDIVES TRANSPORT AND CONTRACTING COMPANY PLC
Comparison Balance Sheet
as at 31 December 2009 and 2010

2010 (MRF)
2009 (MRF)
Increase / Decrease
Amount (MRF)
Percentage(%)
Assets




Non-current assets




Property, plant and equipment
201,690,888
222,609,795
-20,918,907
-9.4
Capital work-in-progress
1,899,089
12,873,127
-10,974,038
-85.2
Investment properties

33,273,838
-33,273,838
-100.0
Intangible assets   
1,454,510
2,245,055
-790,545
-35.2
Assets held for sale  
9,376,330
552,800
8,823,530
1,596.2
Financial investments
53,070,728
48,031,520
5,039,208
10.5
Trade and other receivables
4,408,158
3,271,748
1,136,410
34.7
Total non-current assets
271,899,702
322,857,883
-50,958,181
-15.8





Current assets




Inventories
113,416,738
135,911,034
-22,494,296
-16.6
Goods in transit
3,499,141
3,057,062
442,079
14.5
Trade and other receivables
154,747,714
192,159,494
-37,411,780
-19.5
Cash and cash equivalents
107,434,095
7,780,920
99,653,175
1,280.7
Total current assets
379,097,690
338,908,509
40,189,181
11.9
TOTAL ASSETS  
650,997,391
661,766,392
-10,769,001
-1.6





Equity and Liabilities




Equity




Share capital
12,500,000
12,500,000
0
0.0
General reserve
149,539,082
152,039,082
-2,500,000
-1.6
Fair value reserve
28,941,426
23,902,218
5,039,208
21.1
Retained earnings  
110,147,546
115,669,172
-5,521,626
-4.8
Total equity
301,128,054
304,110,472
-2,982,418
-1.0





Liabilities




Non-current liabilities




Borrowings
28,773,434
45,656,637
-16,883,203
-37.0
Trade payables   
34,119,315
4,434,479
29,684,836
669.4
Total non-current liabilities     
62,892,749
50,091,116
12,801,633
25.6





Current liabilities




Borrowings
133,387,552
169,270,946
-35,883,394
-21.2
Trade and other payables
153,589,036
138,293,858
15,295,178
11.1
Total current liabilities
286,976,588
307,564,804
-20,588,216
-6.7
Total liabilities
349869337
357,655,920
-7,786,583
-2.2
TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITIES
650,997,391
661,766,392
-10,769,001
-1.6
Maldives Transport and Contracting Company Plc. (2010, 2009).

STATE TRADING ORGANAISATION PLC
Comparative Income Statement
for the year ended 31 December 2009 and 2010

2010 (MRF)
2009 (MRF)
Increase / Decrease
Amount(MRF)
Percentage (%)
Sales
4,015,107,365
3,844,618,705
170,488,660
4.4
Cost of sales
-3,539,797,179
-3,423,060,306
-116,736,873
3.4
Gross profit
475,310,186
421,558,399
53,751,787
12.8
Other operating income
36,675,312
40,803,248
-4,127,936
-10.1

511,985,498
462,361,647
49,623,851
10.7
Selling and marketing costs
-180,059,988
-149,625,843
-30,434,145
20.3
Administrative expenses
-158,878,995
-129,463,577
-29,415,418
22.7
Other operating cost
-3,087,998
-2,990,017
-97,981
3.3
Operating profit
169,958,517
180,282,210
-10,323,693
-5.7
Financial income
42,033,091
45,628,882
-3,595,791
-7.9
Financial cost
-88,197,326
-83,704,629
-4,492,697
5.4
Finance cost - net
-46,164,235
-38,075,747
-8,088,488
21.2
Share of profit / (loss) of associates
0
0
0
0.0
Profit before zakat
123,794,282
142,206,463
-18,412,181
-12.9
Zakat
-4,890,084
-2,182,183
-2,707,901
124.1
Profit after zakat
118,904,198
140,024,280
-21,120,082
-15.1
Attributable to:




Equity holders of the Company
118,904,198
140,024,280
-21,120,082
-15.1
Minority interest
0
0
0
0.0

118,904,198
140,024,280
-21,120,082
-15.1
Earnings per share for profit attributable to the




equity holders of the Company during the year




(expressed in Rf per - basic share)
106
124
-18
-14.5

STATE TRADING ORGANAISATION PLC
Comparison Balance Sheet
as at 31 December 2009 and 2010

2010 (MRF)
2009 (MRF)
Increase / Decrease
Amount (MRF)
Percentage (%)
ASSETS




Non-current assets




Property, plant and equipment
507,962,614
294,917,633
213,044,981
72.2
Intangible asset
40,397,482
0
40,397,482
Not defined
Investments in subsidiaries
116,249,935
116,249,935
0
0.0
Investments in associates
10,567,267
10,567,267
0
0.0
Investment in joint venture
4,700,000
4,700,000
0
0.0
Available for sale investment
32,684,938
48,056,800
-15,371,862
-32.0
Trade and other receivables
0
997,330
-997,330
-100.0

712,562,236
475,488,965
237,073,271
49.9
Current assets




inventories
275,539,022
392,125,037
-116,586,015
-29.7
Trade and other receivables
769,651,685
989,526,133
-219,874,448
-22.2
Reinsurance contracts
0
0
0
0.0
Investment held to maturity
0
0
0
0.0
Cash and cash equivalents
466,035,754
385,440,399
80,595,355
20.9

1,511,226,461
1,767,091,569
-255,865,108
-14.5
Total assets
2,223,788,697
2,242,580,534
-18,791,837
-0.8
EQUITY




Capital and reserves for equity holders




Share capital
56,345,500
56,345,500
0
0.0
Share premium
27,814,500
27,814,500
0
0.0
Currency translation reserve
0
0
0
0.0
Claim equalization reserve
0
0
0
0.0
General reserves
313,115,325
289,334,485
23,780,840
8.2
Fair value reserves
28,941,426
23,684,408
5,257,018
22.2
Retained earnings
523,283,358
504,789,879
18,493,479
3.7

949,500,109
901,968,772
47,531,337
5.3
Minority interest
0
0
0
0.0
Total equity
949,500,109
901,968,772
47,531,337
5.3
LIABILITIES




Non- current liabilities




Borrowings
0
7,967,000
-7,967,000
-100.0
Deferred revenue
0
0
0
0.0
Current liabilities




Trade and other payables
565,271,285
526,640,394
38,630,891
7.3
Insurance contracts
0
0
0
0.0
Borrowings
709,017,304
806,004,368
-96,987,064
-12.0
Total liabilities
1,274,288,589
1,340,611,762
-66,323,173
-4.9
Total equity and liabilities
2,223,788,697
2,242,580,534
-18,791,837
-0.8

State Trading Organization Plc. (2010, 2009).

Vertical Analysis
MALDIVES TRANSPORT AND CONTRACTING COMPANY PLC
Comparative Income statement
For the year ended 31 December 2009 and 2010

2010
2009
Amount (MRF)
Percentage (%)
Amount (MRF)
Percentage (%)
Revenue
428,231,046
100.0
474,340,631
100.0
Cost of goods sold
349,263,930
81.6
365,352,276
77.0
Gross profit
78,967,116
18.4
108,988,355
23.0
Other income
4,268,547
1.0
3,871,310
0.8
Selling and distribution expenses
10,154,730
2.4
31,600,959
6.7
Administrative expenses
52,251,808
12.2
63,842,665
13.5
Other expenses
6,133,959
1.4
7,021,364
1.5
Operating profit
14,695,166
3.4
10,394,677
2.2
Finance costs
20,216,792
4.7
22,750,016
4.8
Loss for the year
-5,521,626
-1.3
-12,335,339
-2.6
Earnings per share
-22.09
0.0
-49.42
0.0



MALDIVES TRANSPORT AND CONTRACTING COMPANY PLC
Comparison Balance Sheet
as at 31 December 2009 and 2010

2010
2009
Amount (MRF)
Percentage (%)
Amount (MRF)
Percentage (%)
Assets




Non-current assets




Property, plant and equipment
201,690,888
31.0
222,609,795
33.6
Capital work-in-progress
1,899,089
0.3
12,873,127
1.9
Investment properties

0.0
33,273,838
5.0
Intangible assets   
1,454,510
0.2
2,245,055
0.3
Assets held for sale  
9,376,330
1.4
552,800
0.1
Financial investments
53,070,728
8.2
48,031,520
7.3
Trade and other receivables
4,408,158
0.7
3,271,748
0.5
Total non-current assets
271,899,702
41.8
322,857,883
48.8





Current assets




Inventories
113,416,738
17.4
135,911,034
20.5
Goods in transit
3,499,141
0.5
3,057,062
0.5
Trade and other receivables
154,747,714
23.8
192,159,494
29.0
Cash and cash equivalents
107,434,095
16.5
7,780,920
1.2
Total current assets
379,097,690
58.2
338,908,509
51.2
TOTAL ASSETS  
650,997,391
100.0
661,766,392
100.0





Equity and Liabilities




Equity




Share capital
12,500,000
1.9
12,500,000
1.9
General reserve
149,539,082
23.0
152,039,082
23.0
Fair value reserve
28,941,426
4.4
23,902,218
3.6
Retained earnings  
110,147,546
16.9
115,669,172
17.5
Total equity
301,128,054
46.3
304,110,472
46.0





Liabilities




Non-current liabilities




Borrowings
28,773,434
4.4
45,656,637
6.9
Trade payables   
34,119,315
5.2
4,434,479
0.7
Total non-current liabilities     
62,892,749
9.7
50,091,116
7.6





Current liabilities




Borrowings
133,387,552
20.5
169,270,946
25.6
Trade and other payables
153,589,036
23.6
138,293,858
20.9
Total current liabilities
286,976,588
44.1
307,564,804
46.5
Total liabilities
349,869,337
53.7
357,655,920
54.0
TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITIES
650,997,391
100.0
661,766,392
100.0


STATE TRADING ORGANAISATION PLC
comparative Income statement
For the year ended 31 December 2009 and 2010

2010
2009
Amount (MRF)
Percentage (%)
Amount (MRF)
Percentage (%)
Sales
4,015,107,365
100.0
3,844,618,705
100.0
Cost of sales
3,539,797,179
88.2
3,423,060,306
89.0
Gross profit
475,310,186
11.8
421,558,399
11.0
Other operating income
36,675,312
0.9
40,803,248
1.1

511,985,498
12.8
462,361,647
12.0
Selling and marketing costs
180,059,988
4.5
149,625,843
3.9
Administrative expenses
158,878,995
4.0
129,463,577
3.4
Other operating cost
3,087,998
0.1
2,990,017
0.1
Operating profit
169,958,517
4.2
180,282,210
4.7
Financial income
42,033,091
1.0
45,628,882
1.2
Financial cost
88,197,326
2.2
83,704,629
2.2
Finance cost - net
46,164,235
1.1
38,075,747
1.0
Share of profit / (loss) of associates
0
0.0
0
0.0
Profit before zakat
123,794,282
3.1
142,206,463
3.7
Zakat
4,890,084
0.1
2,182,183
0.1
Profit after zakat
118,904,198
3.0
140,024,280
3.6
Attributable to:




Equity holders of the Company
118,904,198
3.0
140,024,280
3.6
Minority interest
0
0.0
0
0.0

118,904,198
3.0
140,024,280
3.6
Earnings per share for profit attributable to the




equity holders of the Company during the year




(expressed in Rf per - basic share)
106
0.0
124
0.0

STATE TRADING ORGANAISATION PLC
Final statement balance sheet
For the year ended 31 December 2009 and 2010

2010
2009
Amount (MRF)
Percentage (%)
Amount (MRF)
Percentage (%)
ASSETS




Non-current assets




Property, plant and equipment
507,962,614
22.8
294,917,633
13.2
Intangible asset
40,397,482
1.8
0
0.0
Investments in subsidiaries
116,249,935
5.2
116,249,935
5.2
Investments in associates
10,567,267
0.5
10,567,267
0.5
Investment in joint venture
4,700,000
0.2
4,700,000
0.2
Available for sale investment
32,684,938
1.5
48,056,800
2.1
Trade and other receivables
0
0.0
997,330
0.0

712,562,236
32.0
475,488,965
21.2
Current assets




Inventories
275,539,022
12.4
392,125,037
17.5
Trade and other receivables
769,651,685
34.6
989,526,133
44.1
Reinsurance contracts
0
0.0
0
0.0
Investment held to maturity
0
0.0
0
0.0
Cash and cash equivalents
466,035,754
21.0
385,440,399
17.2

1,511,226,461
68.0
1,767,091,569
78.8
Total assets
2,223,788,697
100.0
2,242,580,534
100.0
EQUITY




Capital and reserves attributable to equity holders of the Company




Share capital
56,345,500
2.5
56,345,500
2.5
Share premium
27,814,500
1.3
27,814,500
1.2
Currency translation reserve
0
0.0
0
0.0
Claim equalization reserve
0
0.0
0
0.0
General reserves
313,115,325
14.1
289,334,485
12.9
Fair value reserves
28,941,426
1.3
23,684,408
1.1
Retained earnings
523,283,358
23.5
504,789,879
22.5

949,500,109
42.7
901,968,772
40.2
Minority interest
0
0.0
0
0.0
Total equity
949,500,109
42.7
901,968,772
40.2
LIABILITIES




Non- current liabilities




Borrowings
0
0.0
7,967,000
0.4
Deferred revenue
0
0.0
0
0.0
Current liabilities




Trade and other payables
565,271,285
25.4
526,640,394
23.5
Insurance contracts
0
0.0
0
0.0
Borrowings
709,017,304
31.9
806,004,368
35.9
Total liabilities
1,274,288,589
57.3
1,340,611,762
59.8
Total equity and liabilities
2,223,788,697
100.0
2,242,580,534
100.0
State Trading Organization Plc. (2010, 2009). Maldives Transport and Contracting Company Plc. (2010, 2009).
Ratio Analysis
Ratio Analysis for MTCC PLC and STO PLC
Liquidity Ratios
MTCC PLC
STO PLC
Name of the Ratios
Formulas
2010
2009
2010
2009
Working capital
Current asset-current liability
MRF 92,121,102
MRF 31,343,705
MRF 236,937,872
MRF 434,446,807
Current ratio
Current asset current liability
1.3 : 1
1.1 : 1
1.2 : 1
1.3 : 1
Quick ratio
Quick asset current liability
0.91 : 1
0.65 : 1
1.0 : 1
1.0 : 1






Profitability Ratios


Gross profit margin
Gross profit Sales (net)
18.4%
23.0%
11.8%
11.0%
Net profit margin
Net profit Sales (net)
-1.3%
-2.6%
3.0%
3.6%
Return on assets
Net profit Average total assets
-0.8%
-1.8%
5.3%
7.0%
Return on owners equity
Net profit/Average owners equity
-1.8%
-4.1%
12.8%
16.1%
Earnings per share
(Net profit-Dividend for preference share)/
MRF -22.1
MRF -49.42
MRF 106
MRF 124
Average ordinary shares issued(unit)






Debt Management Ratios


Debt Ratio
Total liability/Total asset
53.7%
54.0%
57.3%
59.8%
Equity Ratio
Total owner equity/Total asset
46.3%
46.0%
42.7%
40.2%
Debt to equity ratio
Total liability/Total owner equity
116.2%
117.6%
134.2%
148.6%






Efficiency Ratios


Average collection period
AR×365/Net credit sales
118 days
132 days
70 days
94 days
Inventory turnover
Cost of goods sold/Average inventory
2.8 times
2.6 times
10.6 times
9.5 times
Asset turnover
Net sales/Average total asset
0.65 times
0.69 times
1.8 times
1.9 times







Interpretation of Ratios
  1. Working capital: If the working capital is higher, the better for the company because it shows the business ability to pay its short-term debts. The calculation shows that the working capital is increased for MTCC but for STO it has decreased from the year 2009 to 2010.

  1. Current ratio: The Current ratio should be 2:1. If it is too less or too high, shows that Current ratio for 10Tcc has increased from 1.1 to 1.3 but it is less than 2:1 which indicates that the company does not have enough current assets to pay off the current liabilities where as for STO this ratio has decreased from 1.3 to 1.2 and it indicates they too do not have enough current assets to pay off their current liabilities.

  1. Quick ratio: The quick ration should be 1:1. If it is too less or too high, it is not good for the company. The calculation shows that quick ratio for MTCC has increased from 0.65 to 0.91 but it indicates that they do not have enough quick assets to pay off immediate debts where as for STO this ratio was constant at 1:1 for both years. It indicates that have enough quick assets to pay off their immediate debts.

Profitability
  1. Gross profit margin: It is the profit on sales. If it is higher, the better for the company. The calculation shows that it has decreased from 23.0% to 18.4% for MTCC. Where as it has increased from 11.0% to     11.8% for STO. This means that for STO has good purchasing management but not for the MTCC.

  1. Net profit margin: It is the profit on sales after deducting the overhead expenses. If it is higher, the better. The calculation shows that it has improved from -2.6% to -1.3% for MTCC. Whereas for STO it has decreased from 3.6% to 3.0%. This means that for MTCC the overhead expenses decreased from the year 2009 to 2010 but for the STO the expenses increased from 2009 to 2010.

  1. Return on assets: If it is higher the better. The calculation shows that it has improved from -1.8% to -0.8% for MTCC. Where as it has decreased from 7.0% to 5.3% for STO. This means that there is good management of assets to generate profit for MTCC but inefficient management of assets for STO.

  1. Return on equity: it is higher the better. The calculation shows that it has improved from -4.1% to -1.8% for MTCC. Where as it has decreased from 16.1% to 12.8% for STO. This means that the business ability of generating profit for owners has improved for MTCC but it has decreased for STO.

  1. Earnings per share: It is the profit generated for each ordinary share. If it is higher the better. The calculation shows that it has improved from MRF-49.42 to MRF-22.1 for MTCC. Where as it has decreased from MRF124 to MRF 106 for STO. This means that there is a loss of MRF-22.1 for MTCC’s shareholders and profit of MRF 106 for STO’s ordinary shareholders in 2010.

Debit management Ratio

  1. Debt ratio: It calculates the total assets financed by creditors.  Owners prefer higher debt ratio as funds financed by loans can generate higher returns. The calculation shows that it has decreased from 54.0% to 53.7% for MTCC and it also has decreased from 59.8% to 57.3% for STO. This means the MTCC’s assets of 53.7% are financed by its creditors. Whereas 57.3% of STO’s assets are financed by its creditors in 2010.

  1. Equity ratio: It calculates the assets financed by the owner. The creditors prefer higher equity ratio. The calculations show that it has increased from 46.0% to 46.3% for MTCC and it has increased from 40.2% to 42.7% for STO. This means that this is a positive sign for their creditors as they can get credit more easily.

  1. Debt to equity ratio: It is the liability covered by equity. The lower this ratio, the better. The calculations show that it has decreased from 117.6% to 116.2% for MTCC and it has also decreased from 148.6% to 134.2% for STO. This means that there are more liabilities in STO compared to MTCC.

Efficiency Ratios
  1. Average collection period: It calculates the number of days taken to collect the amount receivable. If it is lower, the better for the business. The calculations show that it has decreased from 132 days to 118 days for MTCC and it also has decreased from 94 days to 70 days for STO. This means that STO is taken less number of days to collect receivables compared to MTCC.

  1. Inventory turnover: It measures the number of times the inventory has been sold out in a given period of time. If it is higher, the better. The calculations show that it has increased from 2.6 times to 2.8 times for MTCC and it also has increased from 9.5 times to 10.6 times for STO. This means that the performance of STO is high compared to MTCC. It might not show the true picture because both the companies are from two different industries.

  1. Assets turnover: It measures the capability of the business in using the assets to generate sales. If it higher, the better. The calculation show that it has decreased from 0.69 times to 0.65 times for MTCC and it also has decreased from 1.9 times to 1.8 times for STO. This means that the STO is more capable of using its assets to generate sales compared to MTCC.
Maldives Transport and Contracting Company Plc. (2010, 2009). State Trading Organization Plc. (2010, 2009).

Cash flow statement
The cash flow statement shows how an organization raises money and how it spent those funds during a given period of time. It is also an analytical tool which measures an enterprise’s ability to cover its expenses in the near term. Suppose, if a company is consistently bringing in more cash than it spends, it shows that company is considered to be of good value. The cash flow statement includes of three parts; the operations, investing and financing sections.
Operating activities generally reflect cash generated and paid for the firm’s core business functions. Investors prefer companies that produce a net positive cash flow from operating activities.
Investing activities describe the activities of cash associated with outside financing activities. It would normally include long term asset items and sale of non current asset.
Financial activities relates on the amount of cash the company has spent on capital expenditures, such as new equipment or anything else that needed to run the business. It includes acquisitions of other businesses and monetary investments such as money market funds.
It shows that the cash flow statement of MTCC has positive cash flows from operating activities but negative cash flows from financing activities and investing activities, the overall cash flow shows negative for the year 2009 but positive for the year 2010. So their cash flow performance is not good.
The cash flow statement of STO shows positive cash flows from operating activities but negative for the investing activities. It shows positive cash flow of financing activities in the year of 2009 but negative in the year 2010. The overall cash flow is positive for the both years and their cash flow performance is good. (Noor et al., 2010, p. 117-118).

Best company selection
After the analysis of ratios it is understood that STO plc  is able generate more profit than MTCC, since STO’s net profit margin, return on asset, return on owners equity and earnings per share are high comparing to MTCC.
The liquidity ratios show that the liquidity position of STO is better compared to MTCC. The STO has enough quick assets to pay off its immediate debts but MTCC does not have enough liquid assets.
The debt management ratios show that the STO has more liabilities compared to MTCC which is not good for the company because these liabilities are secured against the fixed assets of the business.
The efficiency ratios show that the efficiency of STO is better compared to MTCC since the STO takes less number of days to collect debts and the rate of selling items much faster than MTCC.
It is understood that the STO plc is performing well compared to MTCC plc although their debt management is not well compared to MTCC. So it is advisable to reduce the number of liabilities to be more successful in future.
Conclusion
Although ratio analysis is very important tool to judge the company’s performance there are several problems inherent in attempting to use accounting ratios to assess company performance. Ratios give meaningless figures if the company has generated a loss and there is no absolute definition as to what constitutes a “correct” ratio. They may be calculated almost as one likes, which means that they are capable of manipulation compounding and ratios are often just presented as figures, without any supporting calculations or definitions. Ratio analysis deals only with financial numbers and does not take account of other factors which may affect company performance. If they are calculated over a period of years to provide longitudinal data, then the value of currency in later years will not be the same as that of earlier years, owing to the effect of inflation, etc. It is very difficult to get the better analysis since the both companies are from two different industries which made unable to get industry average.


Appendix 1
Workings of ratio analysis for STO plc
Liquidity Ratios
2010
2009
Working Capital =
1,511,226,461
MRF 236,937,872
1,767,091,569
MRF 434,446,807
-1,274,288,589
-1,332,644,762

Current Ratio =
1,511,226,461
1.2 : 1
1,767,091,569
1.3 : 1
1,274,288,589
1,332,644,762

Quick Ratio =
1,235,687,439
1.0 : 1
1,374,966,532
1.0 : 1
1,274,288,589
1,332,644,762
Profitability Ratios

Gross profit margin =
475,310,186
11.8%
421,558,399
11.0%
4,015,107,365
3,844,618,705

Net profit margin =
118,904,198
3.0%
140,024,280
3.6%
4,015,107,365
3,844,618,705





Return on assets =
118,904,198
5.3%
140,024,280
7.0%
2,233,184,616
2,011,539,929

Return on owners equity =
118,904,198
12.8%
140,024,280
16.1%
925,734,440.5
872,009,697

Earnings per share =
118,904,198
MRf 106
140,024,280
MRF 124
1,126,910
1,126,910






Debt Management Ratios

Debt Ratio =
1,274,288,589
57.3%
1,340,611,762
59.8%
2,223,788,697
2,242,580,534

Equity Ratio =
949,500,109
42.7%
901,968,772
40.2%
2,223,788,697
2,242,580,534

Debt to equity ratio =
1,274,288,589
134.2%
1,340,611,762
148.6%
949,500,109
901,968,772

Efficiency Ratios

Average collection period =
769,651,685×365
70 days
989,526,133×365
94 days
4,015,107,365
3,844,618,705

Inventory turnover =
3,539,797,179
10.6 times
3,423,060,306
9.5 times
333,832,029.5
358,914,697.5

Asset turnover=
4,015,107,365
1.8 times
3,844,618,705
1.9 times
2,233,184,616
2,011,539,929




Workings of ratio analysis for MTCC plc
Liquidity Ratios
2010
2009
Working Capital =
379,097,690
MRF 92,121,102
338,908,509
MRF 31,343,705
-286,976,588
-307,564,804

Current Ratio =
379,097,690
1.3 : 1
338,908,509
1.1 :1
286,976,588
307,564,804

Quick Ratio =
262,181,809
0.91 : 1
199,940,414
0.65 : 1
286,976,588
307,564,804
Profitability Ratios

Gross profit margin =
78,967,116
18.4%
108,988,355
23.0%
428,231,046
474,340,631

Net profit margin =
-5,521,626
-1.3%
-12,355,339
-2.6%
428,231,046
474,340,631





Return on assests =
-5,521,626
-0.8%
-12,355,339
-1.8%
656,381,892
689,690,947

Return on owners equity =
-5,521,626
-1.8%
-12,355,339
-4.1%
301,128,054.0
304,110,472

Earning per share =
-5,521,626
MRf -22.09
-12,355,339
MRF -49.42  
250,000
250,000






Debt Management Ratios

Debt Ratio =
349,869,337
53.7%
357,655,920
54.0%
650,997,391
661,766,392

Equity Ratio =
301,128,054
46.3%
304,110,472
46.0%
650,997,391
661,766,392

Debt to equity ratio =
349,869,337
116.2%
357,655,920
117.6%
301,128,054
304,110,472

Efficiency Ratios

Average collection period =
138,392,236×365
days 118
172,137,376×365
132 days
428,231,046
474,340,631

Inventory turnover =
349,263,930
2.8 times
365,352,276
2.6 times
124,663,886
138,047,912

Asset turnover=
428,231,046
0.65 times
474,340,631
0.69 times
656,381,891.5
689,690,947




References
Dr. Jane, F. H., Mike, S., Jo, P. (n.d). Inherent limitations in using financial ratio analysis to assess small and medium sized company performance. Retrieved July 02, 2011, from http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:RxcAPtIXq4QJ:www.sheffield.ac.uk/content/1/c6/06/89/64/2007-01.pdf+limitation+of+ratio+analysis&hl=en&gl=mv&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESgzzLen1LEdvtdhyV-quz1ZWLzs41A2Hb78Mgofh_9WuwKu7I0pid9mBnkbEJO3oHFy-qqLLlCjOqd_JL-JhVQk6G_93qEcLWxCe7uBS3-_BvMoBKW8dmuiZlxaq2QG1m4D0lD6&sig=AHIEtbQ2pKti6Ugc9g8QNiqib20Y_Nho7A
Noor, A. J., Nor, A. L., Junaidah, H. A., Azlan, Z. A., Amin, A., Norazita, M. A. A., (2010). Financial Accounting. Meteor Doc.Sdn.Bhd: Malaysia.
Maldives Transport and Contracting Company Plc. (2009). Annual Report.
Maldives Transport and Contracting Company Plc. (2010). Annual Report.
State Trading Organization Plc. (2009). Annual Report.
State Trading Organization Plc. (2010). Annual Report.







No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.